Prenatal Diagnosis of Birth Defects by Exome Sequencing

  • Sara Mumtaz National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi
  • Huma Shehwana National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi
  • Sabba Mehmood National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi
Keywords: Birth Defect, Prenatal Testing, Next Generation Sequencing, Exome Sequencing, Congenital Anomalies, Hereditary Defects, High Throughput Methods.

Abstract

Prenatal screening and diagnosis are increasingly becoming a part of medical practice. Prenatal screening can reduce the incidence of birth defects which cause morbidity and mortality in newborns. With emerging technologies, now it is possible to diagnose the genetic basis of birth defects more accurately in the prenatal period for early management. Different approaches are available for detecting genetic defects at different levels like karyotyping, chromosomal microarrays and Sanger sequencing. However, many cases still remain undiagnosed. Next generation sequencing has revolutionized the field of genetics that can detect genetic defects at the level of a single base pair. It includes both whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS). WES has particularly accelerated the discovery of disease-causing variants in many monogenic anomalies postnatally. Research is being conducted on the use of whole exome sequencing in the prenatal diagnostics of genetic anomalies detected by ultrasound. It is a more efficient way of getting an insight into the molecular basis of birth defects compared with conventional genetic approaches. However, technical and ethical issues need to be addressed before introducing this technique into routine prenatal clinical practice. Fetal cell sampling is done by invasive medical procedures like amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. However, noninvasive strategy of collecting fetal DNA from maternal plasma is an exciting and emerging domain. It is evident that in the coming years, we shall be able to use these techniques in the routine clinical setting and to improve the diagnosis and management of birth disorders during prenatal period.

References

Christianson A, Modell B. March of Dimes. Global report on birth defect. The hidden toll of dying and disabled children. New York; 2006.

Jelin AC, Sagaser KG, Wilkins-Haug L. Prenatal Genetic Testing Options. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019; 66: 281-93.

Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1502-11.

Bush LW, Bartoshesky LE, David KL, Wilfond B, Williams JL, Holm IA, et al. Pediatric clinical exome/genome sequencing and the engagement process: encouraging active conversation with the older child and adolescent: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2018; 20: 692-4.

Alfirevic Z, Navaratnam K, Mujezinovic F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9: CD003252.

Cuckle H, Maymon R. Development of prenatal screening--A historical overview. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40: 12-22.

Breman AM, Chow JC, U'Ren L, Normand EA, Qdaisat S, Zhao L, et al. Evidence for feasibility of fetal trophoblastic cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 1009-19.

Fiddler M. Fetal Cell Based Prenatal Diagnosis: Perspectives on the Present and Future. J Clin Med. 2014; 3: 972-85.

Macnamara EF, Schoch K, Kelley EG, Fieg E, Brokamp E, Undiagnosed Diseases N, et al. Cases from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network: The continued value of counseling skills in a new genomic era. J Genet Couns. 2019; 28: 194-201.

Lalonde E, Albrecht S, Ha KC, Jacob K, Bolduc N, Polychronakos C, et al. Unexpected allelic heterogeneity and spectrum of mutations in Fowler syndrome revealed by next-generation exome sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2010; 31: 918-23.

Choi M, Scholl UI, Ji W, Liu T, Tikhonova IR, Zumbo P, et al. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 19096-101.

Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, Lee C, et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature. 2009; 461: 272-6.

Chilamakuri CSR, Lorenz S, Madoui MA, Vodák D, Sun J, Hovig E, et al. Performance comparison of four exome capture systems for deep sequencing. BMC genomics. 2014; 15: 449.

Clark MJ, Chen R, Lam HY, Karczewski KJ, Chen R, Euskirchen G, et al. Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nature biotechnology. 2011; 29: 908.

Best S, Wou K, Vora N, Van der Veyver IB, Wapner R, Chitty LS. Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 10-19.

Drury S, Williams H, Trump N, Boustred C, Gosgene, Lench N, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35: 1010-7.

Lei TY, Fu F, Li R, Wang D, Wang RY, Jing XY, et al. Whole-exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 32: 1665-75.

Lord J, McMullan DJ, Eberhardt RY, Rinck G, Hamilton SJ, Quinlan-Jones E, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet. 2019; 393: 747-57.

Seaby EG, Pengelly RJ, Ennis S. Exome sequencing explained: a practical guide to its clinical application. Brief Funct Genomics. 2016; 15: 374-84.

Parla JS, Iossifov I, Grabill I, Spector MS, Kramer M, McCombie WR. A comparative analysis of exome capture. Genome Biol. 2011; 12: R97.

Guo Y, Ding X, Shen Y, Lyon GJ, Wang K. SeqMule: automated pipeline for analysis of human exome/genome sequencing data. Scientific reports. 2015; 5: 14283.

Meena N, Mathur P, Medicherla KM, Suravajhala P. A Bioinformatics Pipeline for Whole Exome Sequencing: Overview of the Processing and Steps from Raw Data to Downstream Analysis. bioRxiv. 2017: 201145.

Hintzsche JD, Robinson WA, Tan AC. A Survey of Computational Tools to Analyze and Interpret Whole Exome Sequencing Data. Int J Genomics. 2016; 2016: 7983236.

Mumtaz S, Yıldız E, Jabeen S, Khan A, Tolun A, Malik S . RBBP8 syndrome with microcephaly, intellectual disability, short stature and brachydactyly. Am J Med Genet A. 2015; 167A: 3148-52.

Wahab A, Ahmad M. Biosocial perspective of consanguineous marriages in rural and urban Swat, Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci.1996; 28: 305-13.

Peltonen L, Palotie A, Lange K. Use of population isolates for mapping complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2000; 1: 182-90.

Published
2021-02-02
Section
Review Article