Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores: Accuracy of Predictability for Mortality in Acute Variceal Hemorrhage

  • kazim Abbas Virk HBS Medical College and HBS General Hospital, Islamabad
  • Sana Tahir Virk Fazaia Medical College, PAF Hospital, Islamabad
  • Inayt Adil Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad
  • Shiza Tahir Virk Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi
  • Haseeb Noor Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad
  • Tehzeeb Zahra Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad
Keywords: Acute Variceal Hemorrhage, CTP, MELD, Mortality, NPV, PPV, Sensitivity, Specificity.

Abstract

Objective: To determine a score that best predicts the mortality of admitted patients within six weeks of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage (AVH).
Study Design: Cross sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Inpatient Department of Gastroenterology Unit at Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad for six months.
Materials and Methods: The number of patients with AVH enrolled in this study were 223. A pretested questionnaire was used to gather the required information; Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores of each patient were recorded at the time of admission in the inpatient facility. The outcome was documented via a telephonic call at the end of six weeks. The primary outcome of the study was “mortality” at end of six weeks.
Results: The total number of participants were 223, including 61% (n=136) males and 39% (n=87) females. The mean age was 52.4±13.96. The overall mean value of CTP score was 9.6±2.8 and mean value of MELD score was 19.3±6.7, while the mean values of CTP and MELD among non-survivors were 12.9±2.1 and 26.6±5.6, respectively. After six weeks, the number of deaths were 27% (n=60). The MELD had positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.3%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.8%, sensitivity: 91.7%, specificity: 93.3%, diagnostic accuracy: 92.82%, and positive likelihood ratio of 13.68. Similarly, CTP had PPV: 77.4%, NPV: 92.5%, sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 91.4%, diagnostic accuracy: 88.34% and positive likelihood ratio of 9.3. The area under the curve (AUC)for MELD was 0.91, while CTP was 0.90.
Conclusion: The MELD score is better in its discriminative ability and more accurate in predicting six weeks mortality in patients with AVH than CTP score.

Author Biographies

Inayt Adil, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad

 

 

Haseeb Noor, Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad

 

 

References

Peng Y, Qi X, Guo X. Child-Pugh Versus MELD Score for the Assessment of Prognosis in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e2877.

Chen WT, Lin CY, Sheen IS, Huang CW, Lin TN, Lin CJ, et al. MELD score can predict early mortality in patients with rebleeding after band ligation for variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17: 2120-5.

Fortune BE, Garcia-Tsao G, Ciarleglio M, Deng Y, Fallon MB, Sigal S, et al. Child-Turcotte-Pugh Class is Best at Stratifying Risk in Variceal Hemorrhage: Analysis of a US Multicenter Prospective Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017; 51: 446-53.

Sarwar S, Khan AA, Tarique S. Comparison of MELD, Child Pugh score and Rockall score for predicting rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients of variceal bleeding. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008; 18: 524-5.

Vanderbrink BA, Cain MP, King S, Meldrum K, Kaefer M, Misseri R, et al. Is oral vitamin B (12) therapy effective for vitamin B (12) deficiency in patients with prior ileocystoplasty? J Urol. 2010; 184 :1781- 5.

Freire P, Romaozinho JM, Amaro P, Ferreira M, Sofia C. Prognostic scores in cirrhotic patients admitted to a gastroenterology intensive care unit. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011; 103: 177-83.

Zhou C, Hou C, Cheng D, Tang W, Lv W. Predictive accuracy comparison of MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores for survival in patients underwent TIPS placement: a systematic meta-analytic review. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 13464-72.

Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973; 60: 646-9.

Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol. 2005; 42: S100-7.

Fan X, Wen M, Shen Y, Wang W, Yang X, Yang L. Does adding variceal status to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score improve its performance in predicting mortality in cirrhosis? Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e4884.

Giannini E, Botta F, Fumagalli A, Malfatti F, Testa E, Chiarbonello B, et al. Can inclusion of serum creatinine values improve the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and challenge the prognostic yield of the model for end-stage liver disease score in the short-term prognostic assessment of cirrhotic patients? Liver Int. 2004; 24: 465-70.

Kaplan DE, Dai F, Skanderson M, Aytaman A, Baytarian M, D'Addeo K, et al. Recalibrating the Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score to Improve Prediction of Transplant-Free Survival in Patients with Cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61: 3309-20.

World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines on esophageal varices. Source: Global Guidelines by WGO. 2014 Jan;[1-14pp.]. Availablefrom: https://www.worldgastroenterology.org/guidelines/global-guidelines/esophageal-varices/esophageal-varices-english.

Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000; 31: 864-71.

Kamath PS, Kim WR, Advanced Liver Disease Study G. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology. 2007; 45: 797-805.

Trotter JF, Olson J, Lefkowitz J, Smith AD, Arjal R, Kenison J. Changes in international normalized ratio (INR) and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) based on selection of clinical laboratory. Am J Transplant. 2007; 7: 1624-8.

Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV, Vangeli M, Terreni N, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Systematic review: The model for end-stage liver disease--should it replace Child-Pugh's classification for assessing prognosis in cirrhosis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 22: 1079-89.

Kim HJ, Lee HW. Important predictor of mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013; 19: 105-15.

Sala M, Varela M, Bruix J. Selection of candidates with HCC for transplantation in the MELD era. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10: S4-9.

Kim SY, Yim HJ, Lee J, Lee BJ, Kim DI, Jung SW, et al. [Comparison of CTP, MELD, and MELD-Na scores for predicting short term mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis]. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2007; 50: 92-100.

Freeman RB. Mathematical models and behavior: assessing delta MELD for liver allocation. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4: 1735-6.

Luca A, Angermayr B, Bertolini G, Koenig F, Vizzini G, Ploner M, et al. An integrated MELD model including serum sodium and age improves the prediction of early mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13: 1174-80.

Magder LS, Regev A, Mindikoglu AL. Comparison of seven liver allocation models with respect to lives saved among patients on the liver transplant waiting list. Transpl Int. 2012; 25: 409-15.

Hunter SS, Hamdy S. Predictors of early re-bleeding and mortality after acute variceal haemorrhage. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2013; 14: 63-7.

Mohammad AN, Morsy KH, Ali MA. Variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: What is the best prognostic score? Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016; 27: 464-9.

Published
2021-02-02
Section
Original Article